Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities.

نویسندگان

  • Charity J Morgan
  • Julia B LeSage
  • Stephen M Kosslyn
چکیده

The two studies reported in this article are an extension of the neuroimaging study by Ganis et al. (2003), which provided evidence that different types of lies arise from different cognitive processes. We examined the initial response times (IRTs) to questions answered both deceptively and truthfully. We considered four types of deceptive responses: a coherent set of rehearsed, memorized lies about a life experience; a coherent set of lies spontaneously created about a life experience; a set of isolated lies involving self-knowledge; and a set of isolated lies involving knowledge of another person. We assessed the difference between truthful and deceptive IRTs. Scores from cognitive tasks included in the MiniCog Rapid Assessment Battery (MRAB) were significant predictors of IRT differences. Each type of lie was predicted by a distinct set of MRAB scores. These results provide further evidence that deception is a multifaceted process and that different kinds of lies arise from the operation of different cognitive processes.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluation of Cognitive Abilities of Different Groups of Sclerosis Patients and Its Comparison With Healthy People

Objective: Sclerosis is a neurodegenerative disease that is important in measuring and evaluating the cognitive abilities of its patients. Therefore, the diagnostic dimensions of functional differences in cognitive abilities of subgroups of this disease are important.  Methods: The research was done with post-event design. The sample consisted of 60 subjects from different groups of patie...

متن کامل

Towards a Theory of Deception

Deceiving your opponent about your cognitive abilities cannot be captured by standard approaches in which players understand the strategy of their opponent perfectly well. We introduce a framework with boundedly rational players to explain deception. Following Jehiel (2003) we assume that players’ types are characterized by how players partition the decision nodes of their opponents into analog...

متن کامل

تصمیم‌گیری‌های اخلاقی و کارکردهای اجرایی در نوجوانان بر اساس تفاوت‌های فردی در تیپ‌های زیستی شخصیت

Biological aspects of personality have an important influence on the individual’s psychological dimensions and moral decision making and cognitive abilities can be affected by these dimensions. The aim of the present study was to investigate moral decision making and executive functions based on morning and evening personality types in adolescents. For this purpose, Initially 362 adolesce...

متن کامل

Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: an individual difference approach using fMRI.

Two hypotheses were tested using a novel individual differences approach, which identifies rate-limiting brain regions, that is, brain regions in which variations in neural activity predict variations in behavioral performance. The first hypothesis is that the rate-limiting regions that support the production of lies about oneself (self-related) are partially distinct from those underlying the ...

متن کامل

“Have You Ever Seen This Face?” – Individual Differences and Event-Related Potentials during Deception

Deception studies emphasize on the importance of event-related potentials (ERP) for a reliable differentiation of the underlying neuro-cognitive processes. The stimulus-locked parietal P3 amplitude has been shown to reflect stimulus salience but also attentional control available for stimulus processing. Known stimuli requiring truthful responses (targets) and known stimuli requiring deceptive ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social neuroscience

دوره 4 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009